Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2
The adventures of the most famous wizard in glasses ending with “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2″, a more than satisfactory conclusion to a series which has made its share of dreams large and small children.
The carrots are cooked. This is especially true when Hogwarts becomes the battleground of epic clashes between the forces of Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes) and those of Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe).
“Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1″ had much attention when it was released. Although it was still directed by David Yates (who is also has the 5e and 6e), the pace slow and meditative deliberately contrasted with the previous volumes. As if Harry Potter had finally become an adult and he took his time to speak, live real emotions and real moral issues rather than always fighting and running. A style that has not pleased all audiences, but that was at least the advantage of taking risks, as well as being terribly original and ambitious.
The ultimate component hands over pendulums to time and focuses on the action and prosecution in a hunt for the Horcruxes. The rapid pace, directing controlled Yates and the great care given to the technical elements can not obscure the thinness of the script and bland dialogue. Especially that the viewer feels difficult to the end of the world weigh on the shoulders of the hero.
Fortunately, it manages at the battle of Hogwarts. The clashes are not too spectacular, the pieces of courage and touches of humor succession at the turn, while the three-dimensional effects previously unnecessary increase in value. Ironically, when gravity is present the story about the various absurd, ranging, for example exploring the tragic fate of Rogue.
The signs of the end does not, however, are smooth. It talks about death without avoiding cliches and moralistic tone of use. Very quiet so far, sentimentality to a head, encompassing all of violins and cakes. Some exchanges are still far too explanatory and the final stretches more or less convincing in length, like that of the third “Lord of the Rings”.
Whether to praise the atmosphere and the superb photography winding, uneven interpretation leaves something to be desired. Adults play the notes perfectly, especially Alan Rickman’s character who has offered the most fascinating of the lot. Except that the “children” are not the same finesse. Emma Watson and Rupert Grint seem less populated than in previous tests, while Daniel Radcliffe is not always able to raise his game when the pressure is felt. It is also unfortunate that the emotion goes more through the vibrant soundtrack by Alexandre Desplat rather than actors.
These few wrong notes are not numerous enough to leave an aftertaste in the mouth. “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2″ looks great pleasure, and it is sometimes more entertaining than profound, it is the perfect companion to complete this long and successful series where the quality was almost always appointment.
Related posts:
